you are welcome brother, lets have our opinions on this matter

Can't wait for people to answer that, so I learn something there.

you are welcome

you are welcome to the forum

Yes thats to me makes a lot of sense since the market cap is from the real market and listing coins in websites or platforms doesn't necessarily means all cryptos listed makes the market cap

this is very important for people to understand, we can see out of the massive number of cryptos the reliable and stable investments are few despite being listed or being famous

so in essence being famous or popular doesn't qualify to be worthy coin/token to invest in.. Good. Because I think most of these shitty websites are only paid to popularize/advertise these shitcoins

Thats very true

exaaaaactly brother 

statistical websites needs someone with basic knowledge especially when it comes to important factors to analyse the asset for investment, funny thing in CMC, some cryptos are listed but their information are not verified by external teams hence they are  not verified and their details have a warning sign that the details are from the project team but not verified with the  CMC team

this is very good info. So with basic understanding, just with CMC alone someone can deduce is a project is good or not, but checking if a project/coin/token is verified

this PLC thing has made people lose a lot of money simply because of being listed

I had that habit of buying cheap crypto when i see them listed in CMC 😪😪😪 Now am saved thanks to DIENA 

very informative

now I have a better understanding of the difference between CoinGecko and CMC

And also the project being verified alone is not enaugh for you to choose if its a good project,

because the data of the project can be verified but still the project is not stable and not having a stable tokenomics and great ecosystem for it to excell thus its important to take note.

also some new projects may not have a verfication badge but still they are good projects to invest, its very important to have informed knowledge as most of the time verification of the crypto can come due to popularity but not sable tokenomics or great project ecosystem

Thank you I got something here.

for a coin being listed and its having no verifiable data is such a big redflag, despite of that this PLCU thing is having such a complicated unnecessary structure with unnecessary version of token time to time, and people still fall for a trap 

thank you for this

I see the idea

I think its better to look on various sources of information before making a decision the crypto analysis platform are useful but not only to rely on. more analysis should be done on various aspects includiding the whitepaper

yeah you are right

Thanks to  DIENA that  provides all the knowledge you need to know on how to analyze crypto and be good at blockchain in general 👌

I am too, trying here😀

numbers 3 and 4 are very new to me. I consder this a time well spent this evening just learning these things. I am growing daily! Thank you mwalimu

This is a chunk of knowledge thanks for sharing 🚀🚀

you can say that again my brother

they have a self reported volume because CMC has more than 18000 cryptos more than COINGECKO, and infact coingecko todays ready capitilation of 1.25trillion while CMC reads at 1.21trillion so that may not be a factor but the major factor is to check the criteria which a considered for a crypto to be counted in the total market capitilization

Duly noted, I will check it out right away. Thank you

they have a self reported volume because CMC has more than 18000 cryptos more than COINGECKO, and infact coingecko todays ready capitilation of 1.25trillion while CMC reads at 1.21trillion so i think, that may not be a factor but the major factor is to check the criteria which a considered for a crypto to be counted in the total market capitilization